All rules, policies, and bylaws of the foundation and the corporation shall have two equally powerful parts  --  the letter of those rules and the stated intentions within them.   Whenever a rule, policy, or bylaw  its intention shall also be written with it.   This includes anything and everything about the foundation and the corporation that could be interpreted in more than one way.   A violation of the rule's stated intention shall be equal to a violation of the letter of the rule.   

In any questionable practice, the Arbitrators shall resolve the disputes at their discretion.   The Arbitrators' decisions are appealable to a combined decision of  the other  three branches of the trust, (Rule-Makes,  Managers, and  Reality-Checkers )  The three-branch decisions are final and unappealable.   

All rules, policies, and bylaws must be written in plain, easy-to-understand language.   Any attempt to hide a rule under complicated sentence structure or by unwritten implication is prohibited.   Any time a rule is found to be confusing or that it is being misinterpreted by the beneficiaries, the wording must be altered, and both its meaning and its  intention must be made clear.   

Relevant Amendments:   

Any time a rule, policy or guideline is being voted on, all amendments to the original rule, policy or guideline must be relevant to the main issue.   For example, if a proposed bylaw regarding paying for employee health care was the main issue, an amendment to build an addition to parking garage would be out of place, not accepted as an amendment, and not legally binding.   Whenever an amendment's relevancy is in question, the Arbitrators will determine its relevancy or non-relevancy.     The Arbitrators' decisions are appealable to a combined decision of  the other  three branches of the trust, (Rule-Makes,  Managers, and  Reality-Checkers )  The three-branch decisions are final and unappealable.   

Here's  an example of the type of unethical practices that the foundation  intends to avoid and  prohibit:   The auto insurance industry in California is legally prohibited from discriminating against a driver and charging insurance premiums based upon where the driver lives.   The industry honors the letter of the law but grossly and blatantly violates its intent.  The industry discriminates by charging premiums based upon the address where the car is garaged/parked.  

Amendments must be related